7月下旬暑期強(qiáng)化黃金備考期同時(shí)也是每年棄考高發(fā)期，這個(gè)時(shí)候一定要穩(wěn)住堅(jiān)持學(xué)習(xí)，***老師的每日一句也繼續(xù)陪伴著大家，下面一起來看下2021考研***每日一句:第169句。

今天的句子：

Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.

思考題：

An argument made by supporters of smoking was that ________.

[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death

[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant

[C] people had the freedom to choose their own way of life

[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonsense

詞匯突破：

1. correlation 聯(lián)系

2. nonsense 胡說八道

3. argument 論點(diǎn) (一些語(yǔ)境下也可以是論據(jù);)

4. inconclusive 無定論的，不確定的，沒有說服力的;

5. lobby 游說團(tuán)體

6. buy 相信

題干中的定位詞有兩點(diǎn)很關(guān)鍵：

1. argument：這個(gè)說明需要找觀點(diǎn);

2. supporters of smoking 這個(gè)詞說明需要找誰(shuí)的觀點(diǎn);

第一句：(第三個(gè)小分句是符合題干定位要求的句子)

Do you remember all those years/when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure?

切分：

1. Do you remember all those years?

還記得那些日子嗎?

2. when scientists argued that smoking would kill us.

科學(xué)家認(rèn)為吸煙會(huì)殺了我們。

3. But the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure.

但是懷疑者堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為我們還不能確定地知道。

第二句：(符合題干定位要求的句子)

That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain?

切分：

新聞媒體開頭喜歡標(biāo)新立異，有些用法就不是很規(guī)范，比如這里的that其實(shí)就是第一句中insist后的that;所以第二句就是doubters的觀點(diǎn)：(問號(hào)其實(shí)還是第一句中第一個(gè)小分句的問號(hào)，本身這個(gè)句子是沒有疑問語(yǔ)氣的。)

1. the evidence was inconclusive,

2. the science(was)uncertain. (并列引起省略,補(bǔ)全!)

第三句：(符合題干定位要求的句子)

That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way?

這句同樣是第一句中insist的賓語(yǔ)從句：

切分：

1.the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life

吸煙的游說團(tuán)體正準(zhǔn)備摧毀我們的生活方式。

2.the government should stay out of the way

政府應(yīng)該別插手。

第四句：(不符合題干定位要求的句子，這是作者觀點(diǎn)，不是吸煙支持者的觀點(diǎn)。)

切分：

1.Lots of Americans bought that nonsense,

很多美國(guó)人都相信了這種胡說八道。

2.over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.

過去的三十年間，有大約一千萬(wàn)吸煙者過早的死去。

只能用下面的句子和選項(xiàng)進(jìn)行比對(duì)，和這些句子無關(guān)的選項(xiàng)就屬于定位錯(cuò)誤：

1.the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure.

2. the evidence was inconclusive,

3. the science(was)uncertain.

4.the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life

5.the government should stay out of the way

首先：

[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant

過去十年間，由于吸煙死亡的人數(shù)微不足道。

這個(gè)選項(xiàng)和以上句子不相關(guān)，而且整個(gè)段落道都沒有insignificant的表達(dá)。

排除!

[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonsense

反對(duì)吸煙的人通常在胡說八道

這個(gè)選項(xiàng)和以上句子都不相關(guān)。

而且從原文可以知道是“作者認(rèn)為支持吸煙的人在胡說八道”

接著：

[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death

這個(gè)選項(xiàng)和第2小分句有關(guān)：

2. the evidence was inconclusive,

證據(jù)不確定。

原文中的evidence是科學(xué)家提出的證據(jù)，

所以就可以等于選項(xiàng)中的：scientific evidence

of the correlation between smoking and death，也是文章中出現(xiàn)的，可以接受。

但是我們仔細(xì)的看一下選項(xiàng)：

there was no scientific evidence

(不存在科學(xué)證據(jù))

出題人很狡猾!

原文說的是證據(jù)不確定!

選項(xiàng)說的是不存在證據(jù)!

這是典型的偷換否定對(duì)象啊!

不確定≠不存在 排除!是不是666!

[C] people had the freedom to choose their own way of life

(人們有選擇生活方式的自由。)

對(duì)應(yīng)句子：

The antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way

反對(duì)吸煙的游說團(tuán)體準(zhǔn)備摧毀我們的生活方式，政府應(yīng)該別插手。

所以該選項(xiàng)是正話反說!正確!

以上就是新文道考研小編整理的“***2021考研每日一句：第169句”相關(guān)內(nèi)容，希望對(duì)2021考研人有所幫助。

推薦閱讀：

2021考研***每日一句匯總

***每日一句有用嗎?怎么使用?

本文素材來源于網(wǎng)絡(luò)，由武漢新文道考研進(jìn)行整理，想了解更多關(guān)于考研相關(guān)資訊，敬請(qǐng)關(guān)注新文道考研，我們將為同學(xué)們奉上全面完整的時(shí)下考研相關(guān)資訊。