2018考研英語(yǔ)復(fù)習(xí)正在進(jìn)行中,***老師的每日一句每年都很受關(guān)注,在長(zhǎng)難句解析拆分句子的方法也講解得十分到位,新文道考研官網(wǎng)匯總了***2018考研英語(yǔ)每日一句,下面是***每日一句第230句。
今天的句子:
If it wins congressional support this year, the FAA would lose more than 65 percent of its workers and be reduced to the role of a regulatory oversight agency, much like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which issues auto regulations and recalls faulty vehicles.
詞匯突破:
1.Congressional support 國(guó)會(huì)支持
2.FAA/Federal Aviation Administration 聯(lián)邦航空管理局
3.Reduce 降低;減少
4.Oversight 監(jiān)督
5.Issue 出臺(tái)
6.Recall 召回
7.Faulty 故障
確定主干:The FAA would lose more than 65 percent of its workers and be reduced to the role of a regulatory oversight agency
切分成分:1.much like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,定語(yǔ)
2. which issues auto regulations and recalls faulty vehicles. 定語(yǔ)從句
3.If it wins congressional support this year 狀語(yǔ)從句
提示一下:it指的是上文中的特朗普預(yù)算。因?yàn)闆](méi)有給前文,所以大家不知道。
參考譯文:如果預(yù)算今年獲得國(guó)會(huì)支持,聯(lián)邦航空局將失去65%的職員,淪為只具監(jiān)督職能的管理機(jī)構(gòu),就像美國(guó)國(guó)家公路交通安全管理局,只出臺(tái)汽車(chē)管理辦法和召回故障車(chē)輛。
重要背景介紹:
共和黨最近廣受詬病的預(yù)算草案計(jì)劃將聯(lián)邦航空局3萬(wàn)個(gè)職位從聯(lián)邦政府薪水名冊(cè)上除名,并削減了運(yùn)輸部門(mén)預(yù)算的13%。這3萬(wàn)個(gè)職位包括14000位空管員和16000位其它員工,他們都是“下一代”(NextGen)項(xiàng)目的成員。該項(xiàng)目的宗旨是提升飛機(jī)旅行速度、節(jié)約航空燃料和在20年的時(shí)間內(nèi)多容納20%的空中旅客。然而項(xiàng)目的實(shí)際成績(jī)與宗旨相差甚遠(yuǎn),政府問(wèn)責(zé)辦公室(美國(guó)政府的內(nèi)部審計(jì)機(jī)構(gòu))的多次報(bào)告都直接對(duì)其進(jìn)行了批評(píng)。共和黨此次行動(dòng)的目的在于將這個(gè)項(xiàng)目私有化,通過(guò)市場(chǎng)的運(yùn)作來(lái)提高空管的效率并最終令納稅者受益(benefit to the flying public and taxpayers overall)。令人叫奇的是,行業(yè)工會(huì)對(duì)大量成員將失去“皇糧”拍手叫好,認(rèn)為空管網(wǎng)絡(luò)早就應(yīng)該和世界上許多國(guó)家一樣由私營(yíng)部門(mén)運(yùn)營(yíng)。“太久啦,聯(lián)邦政府一直是我們空管系統(tǒng)升級(jí)成世界一流水平的最大障礙。就像華盛頓的許多創(chuàng)造性變革一樣,既定利益團(tuán)體會(huì)說(shuō)任何話(huà)做任何事來(lái)保護(hù)自己狹隘的利益。但真相并不在他們的一邊。”(but the facts are not on their side)其他不說(shuō),特朗普確實(shí)是一名務(wù)實(shí)的人,絕不養(yǎng)閑人。這點(diǎn)來(lái)看,可以為他點(diǎn)贊。
明天的句子:
Whereas advertisers usually get strict assurances about how and where their ads will be placed on television and in print publications, Google and other internet players like Facebook do not provide the same oversight. This is because of the volume of websites they deal with, because of the fact that they have less direct control over the content uploaded to those sites and because algorithms, rather than humans place the majority of ads.
本文素材來(lái)源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),由武漢新文道考研進(jìn)行整理,想了解更多關(guān)于考研相關(guān)資訊,敬請(qǐng)關(guān)注新文道考研,我們將為同學(xué)們奉上全面完整的時(shí)下考研相關(guān)資訊。







關(guān)注武漢新文道微信